三级供应链合作利润.doc
约75页DOC格式手机打开展开
三级供应链合作利润,摘 要当今市场经济环境下，企业之间的竞争已逐渐演化为供应链与供应链之间的竞争。同时，竞争环境的日益复杂以及企业可用资源的有限性等因素使得供应链中的企业势必要在创新方面开展更加广泛的协同，有效整合企业创新所需的各种资源和能力，从而实现协同创新。而要使供应链成员从整个供应链合作最优的角度决策，就必须对合作利润在各成员间进行...
内容介绍
此文档由会员 违规屏蔽12 发布
摘 要
当今市场经济环境下，企业之间的竞争已逐渐演化为供应链与供应链之间的竞争。同时，竞争环境的日益复杂以及企业可用资源的有限性等因素使得供应链中的企业势必要在创新方面开展更加广泛的协同，有效整合企业创新所需的各种资源和能力，从而实现协同创新。而要使供应链成员从整个供应链合作最优的角度决策，就必须对合作利润在各成员间进行合理分配，使成员各自利润都得到提高的同时又保证整个渠道总利润最大，这将对加深成员之间的合作关系、维持供应链稳定性具有重要的意义。
本文选取具有典型意义的三级供应链作为研究对象，在考虑三方成员同时创新的基础上，运用博弈论及相关方法，建立了三级供应链合作利润分配模型，包括集中决策情况下的模型、分散决策情况下的模型（两种）、存在部分联盟情况下的模型（两种），并对这几种模型的决策变量及各方利润作比较；对三级供应链合作利润进行分配，在传统的三方同时分配的基础上提出了两步分配法，并确定了产品的中间转移价格；通过利用收入共享契约进行利润分配，讨论了收入共享契约与因子分配法的区别与联系；提出了构建第三方机构进行利润分配并探讨了利用第三方机构进行利润补偿机制、团体惩罚机制；研究了多次合作情况下的利润分配机制。
本文的主要创新体现在：（1）模型建立方面：在分析供应链成员交易过程的基础上，还考虑了供应链成员的创新情况，即销售量的大小不仅取决于价格，还取决于成员的创新情况，即市场价格越低或成员创新能力越强，销售量越大；（2）利润分配方法方面：借鉴通信网络中的两种不同网络结构：集中式结构和分布式结构，提出了两步分配法：先是供应商与制造商和零售商组成的整体进行分配，然后制造商再与零售商进行二次分配。
关键词 供应链；合作；利润分配；Stackelberg博弈；分配方法；分配机制
Abstract
In today’s marketing economic environment, competition among enterprises has gradually become competitive between supply chain and supply chain. Meanwhile, competitive environment is increasingly complex and the resources available to the enterprise is limited, enterprises in the supply chain must collaborate more extensive in innovation in order to integrate all kinds of resources and capacity which is required by enterprise innovation and achieve collaborative innovation. If we want enterprises in supply chain decision-making from optimum angle of entire supply chain, it must distribute cooperation profits in a reasonable way among members, which makes all the members’ profits increased and the total channel profits is the largest at the same time, and it is very meaningful to deepen cooperation among members and to maintain stability in the supply chain.
A typical three-level supply chain is selected as a research object in this paper, a three-level supply chain profits distribution model is established through game theory and related methods in considering three members innovate simultaneously, including centralized decision, decentralized decision(two models) and part of alliance decision(Two models),and decision variables and members' profits of these models are compared; then cooperation profits of three-level supply chain is allocated, a two-step distribution method on the basis of the traditional distribution is proposed, and the transfer price of intermediate products is determined; next, distributing profits through revenue sharing contract is provided , the difference and connection between revenue sharing contract and the factor distribution method is discussed; at last, profits distribution mechanism of three-level supply chain based on third-party institution involvement is discussed, using third-party institution for working up profits compensation mechanism and group punishment mechanism is probed, and profits distribution mechanism for multiple cooperation are discussed.
The innovations of this dissertation are: (1)model-building: considering innovation in the supply chain members besides transaction procedure, that is the size of sales depends not only the sales price but also the innovation of members ,the lower the sales price is, the harder the members are, the size of sales is larger.(2)profits distribution methods: draw on two different communication networks network structure: centralized structure and the distributed structure, a two-step distribution method is proposed: firstly, supplier distribute profits with the entirety of manufacturer and retailer ,and then manufacturer distribute profits with retailer.
Keywords Three-level Supply Chain; Cooperation; Profit Allocation; Stackelberg Game; Allocation Methods; Allocation Mechanism
目 录
摘 要 I
Abstract II
第1章 绪 论 1
1.1 研究背景、目的和意义 1
1.1.1 研究背景 1
1.1.2 研究目的和意义 1
1.2 国内外研究现状 2
1.2.1 供应链利润分配方法研究现状 2
1.2.2 供应链利润分配机制研究现状 4
1.3 研究思路、主要内容及创新点 7
1.3.1 研究思路 7
1.3.2 主要研究内容 7
1.3.3 创新点 8
第2章 相关理论综述 9
2.1 委托代理理论 9
2.2 博弈理论 9
2.3 利润转移理论 10
2.4 供应链利润分配模型 12
2.5 供应链核心企业与合作关系 14
2.5.1 主体企业与核心企业 14
2.5.2 核心企业的作用 16
2.5.3 渠道权力的对角线转移 18
2.6 本章小结 21
第3章 供应链合作利润分配机制 22
3.1 供应链合作利润分配的内涵 22-b..
当今市场经济环境下，企业之间的竞争已逐渐演化为供应链与供应链之间的竞争。同时，竞争环境的日益复杂以及企业可用资源的有限性等因素使得供应链中的企业势必要在创新方面开展更加广泛的协同，有效整合企业创新所需的各种资源和能力，从而实现协同创新。而要使供应链成员从整个供应链合作最优的角度决策，就必须对合作利润在各成员间进行合理分配，使成员各自利润都得到提高的同时又保证整个渠道总利润最大，这将对加深成员之间的合作关系、维持供应链稳定性具有重要的意义。
本文选取具有典型意义的三级供应链作为研究对象，在考虑三方成员同时创新的基础上，运用博弈论及相关方法，建立了三级供应链合作利润分配模型，包括集中决策情况下的模型、分散决策情况下的模型（两种）、存在部分联盟情况下的模型（两种），并对这几种模型的决策变量及各方利润作比较；对三级供应链合作利润进行分配，在传统的三方同时分配的基础上提出了两步分配法，并确定了产品的中间转移价格；通过利用收入共享契约进行利润分配，讨论了收入共享契约与因子分配法的区别与联系；提出了构建第三方机构进行利润分配并探讨了利用第三方机构进行利润补偿机制、团体惩罚机制；研究了多次合作情况下的利润分配机制。
本文的主要创新体现在：（1）模型建立方面：在分析供应链成员交易过程的基础上，还考虑了供应链成员的创新情况，即销售量的大小不仅取决于价格，还取决于成员的创新情况，即市场价格越低或成员创新能力越强，销售量越大；（2）利润分配方法方面：借鉴通信网络中的两种不同网络结构：集中式结构和分布式结构，提出了两步分配法：先是供应商与制造商和零售商组成的整体进行分配，然后制造商再与零售商进行二次分配。
关键词 供应链；合作；利润分配；Stackelberg博弈；分配方法；分配机制
Abstract
In today’s marketing economic environment, competition among enterprises has gradually become competitive between supply chain and supply chain. Meanwhile, competitive environment is increasingly complex and the resources available to the enterprise is limited, enterprises in the supply chain must collaborate more extensive in innovation in order to integrate all kinds of resources and capacity which is required by enterprise innovation and achieve collaborative innovation. If we want enterprises in supply chain decision-making from optimum angle of entire supply chain, it must distribute cooperation profits in a reasonable way among members, which makes all the members’ profits increased and the total channel profits is the largest at the same time, and it is very meaningful to deepen cooperation among members and to maintain stability in the supply chain.
A typical three-level supply chain is selected as a research object in this paper, a three-level supply chain profits distribution model is established through game theory and related methods in considering three members innovate simultaneously, including centralized decision, decentralized decision(two models) and part of alliance decision(Two models),and decision variables and members' profits of these models are compared; then cooperation profits of three-level supply chain is allocated, a two-step distribution method on the basis of the traditional distribution is proposed, and the transfer price of intermediate products is determined; next, distributing profits through revenue sharing contract is provided , the difference and connection between revenue sharing contract and the factor distribution method is discussed; at last, profits distribution mechanism of three-level supply chain based on third-party institution involvement is discussed, using third-party institution for working up profits compensation mechanism and group punishment mechanism is probed, and profits distribution mechanism for multiple cooperation are discussed.
The innovations of this dissertation are: (1)model-building: considering innovation in the supply chain members besides transaction procedure, that is the size of sales depends not only the sales price but also the innovation of members ,the lower the sales price is, the harder the members are, the size of sales is larger.(2)profits distribution methods: draw on two different communication networks network structure: centralized structure and the distributed structure, a two-step distribution method is proposed: firstly, supplier distribute profits with the entirety of manufacturer and retailer ,and then manufacturer distribute profits with retailer.
Keywords Three-level Supply Chain; Cooperation; Profit Allocation; Stackelberg Game; Allocation Methods; Allocation Mechanism
目 录
摘 要 I
Abstract II
第1章 绪 论 1
1.1 研究背景、目的和意义 1
1.1.1 研究背景 1
1.1.2 研究目的和意义 1
1.2 国内外研究现状 2
1.2.1 供应链利润分配方法研究现状 2
1.2.2 供应链利润分配机制研究现状 4
1.3 研究思路、主要内容及创新点 7
1.3.1 研究思路 7
1.3.2 主要研究内容 7
1.3.3 创新点 8
第2章 相关理论综述 9
2.1 委托代理理论 9
2.2 博弈理论 9
2.3 利润转移理论 10
2.4 供应链利润分配模型 12
2.5 供应链核心企业与合作关系 14
2.5.1 主体企业与核心企业 14
2.5.2 核心企业的作用 16
2.5.3 渠道权力的对角线转移 18
2.6 本章小结 21
第3章 供应链合作利润分配机制 22
3.1 供应链合作利润分配的内涵 22-b..
