法学毕业论文：中国法学教育中的判例教学方法：现状、问题与出路.doc

共20页，字数总计：14115
摘 要

众所周知，在中国的法学教育中，判例教学方法已经被广泛应用于教学活动当中，并且其在法学教育中也起到了举足轻重的作用，这种方法可以很好的使理论与实际、课堂和现实相结合，有利于学生和老师的互动交流，也对学生的发散思维有很大帮助，毕竟法学传统教育的逻辑性是很强但是却少了些对经验事物的关照，这和实际中对法律从业人员的要求是不合的，所以判例教学方法是很重要的一种法学教育方法。但是，由于中国的特殊国情以及中国所采用的大陆法系的法学体系，使得判例教学方法在实践当中遇到了很多问题，并且学生的反应和效果也不是很好，可谓收效甚微。
法学是一门应用性很强的综合学科。法学教育的根本目的之一，在于提高学生应用法律知识解决实际问题的能力，案例教学法对实现这一目的有不可替代的作用。我国不少专家学者强调在高校法学教学中采用案例教学法，对课堂教学方法的改革已成为共识，文章就对案例教学的有关问题作简要的分析，并与之交流。
中国法学教育中的判例教学法的现状如上所述，存在的问题却不只这些，包括判例的释义的不准确性导致在教学实践中所运用的判例并不是真正的案例，用以荒唐的案例，在基于解释法律条文，最终导致又一个荒唐的判决结果的产生，而这些问题的根源就在于，中国法学无论是在司法实践还是在教学中，所引用的判例很多是编造的，而编造的判例则失去了判例的本来意义。
所以，文章旨在通过分析上述问题，找出原因，并根据实际情况和法学理性逻辑，以找到法学教育中，判例教学法的出路——即让判例成为真正的判例，以彰显出判例的本来意义。
关键词：法学，判例教学，制度约束，逻辑推理
ABSTRACT

As we all know, in Chinese law education, case method has been widely used in law teaching activity, and also played a significant role in law education, this approach can be very good to theory and practice, classroom and realities Combination will help students and teachers interact more conveniently, and improving divergent thinking of students does much help, after all, the logic of traditional law education is very strong but divergent thinking is very weak which promised, what this is and practice of legal practitioners The requirements are incompatible, so the case method is very important to a law education methods. However, due to Chinese specific national conditions and the law system——civil law used in China, making the case method in practice, who has many problems encountered, and the students’ response and effect are not very good, which can be said to have little effect.
Law is a high applied integrated subject. One of the fundamental purpose of law education is to improve the students’ application law knowledge to solve practical problems, case method for achieving this goal have an irreplaceable role. Many experts and scholars of the College of Law emphasize in the use of case method, and the classroom teaching methods must reform which has become a consensus, and this article has a brief analysis and communication of relevant issues on the case method.
The status in law education in China of teaching in the case method is mentioned above, but is not only these problems above, which also includes inaccuracies in the interpretation of law case in the teaching practice, which is used in is not really case, and using the case for the absurd, then basing on interpretation of the provisions of the law, which results in an absurd verdict. The root of the emergence of causes for these problems is that the Chinese judicial practice of law either in teaching or in the case cited are fabricated, which has lose the original meaning of the case.
Therefore, this article aims at analyzing the problem, which identifies the causes, the actual situation and the legal rational logic to find the solution of the case method in law education —— that is to make the case become the real precedent case so that to highlighting the case’ original significance.


Key words： law, case methods ,institutional constraints, logical reasoning
目 录

中文摘要 Ⅰ

ABSTRACT Ⅱ

1 绪论 23

2 正文 24
2.1 国内的案例研究 27
2.2 什么是判例 30
2.3 中国判例教学之症结 32
2.4 出路 33
3 结论 35

参考文献 36