抽象行政行为和具体行政行为划分标准的思考.doc
约10页DOC格式手机打开展开
抽象行政行为和具体行政行为划分标准的思考,页数 10字数 9544【摘要】抽象行政行为和具体行政行为作为一学术上的分类被行政诉讼法所采用，囿于学分类，抽象行政行为与具体行政行为不能在行政机关的全部行政行为中划出两者的明确界线，且在理论和实践中一直未能得到很好的解决。探讨两者的划分标准，不仅关系到法院对行政机关的监督范围和...
内容介绍
此文档由会员 孙阳阳 发布
抽象行政行为和具体行政行为划分标准的思考
页数 10 字数 9544
【摘要】抽象行政行为和具体行政行为作为一学术上的分类被行政诉讼法所采用，囿于学分类，抽象行政行为与具体行政行为不能在行政机关的全部行政行为中划出两者的明确界线，且在理论和实践中一直未能得到很好的解决。探讨两者的划分标准，不仅关系到法院对行政机关的监督范围和幅度，同时亦涉及到对行政相对人合法权益的保护力度。因此本文通过对两者定义的解释、理论界主要划分标准的评析、提出了对两者划分标准的建议几个方面来对两者的划分标准进行探讨。
【关键词】抽象行政行为,具体行政行为,划分标准
【abstract】As a academic classification, abstract administrative behavior and concrete administrative behavior are introduced into administrative proceeding. Limited by academic classification, abstract administrative behavior and concrete administrative behavior can not have a clear confines in all the administrative organ’s adiminstrative behavior, and further more it has not been well resolve yet. It is obvious that discuss their compartmentalize criterion, not only relate to the court’s supervision extension, but also relate to the protective degree to the civilian‘s rights and interets. So the article explains the two definition, comments the compartmentalize criterion, and aslo puts forward some suggestions about the criterion of the two definition’s compartmentalization. Finally the article even discusses the criterion of the two definition’s compartmentalization.
【Key word】abstract administrative behavior concrete administrative behavior
compartmentalize criterion
【参考资料】
【文献】1、罗豪才主编 《行政法学》 北京大学出版社
2、刘莘、马怀德、杨惠基主编《中国行政法学新理念》 中国方正出版社
3、张文显主编 《法理学》 法律出版社
【论文】1、刘莘 《谈抽象行政行为的特征》
2、李向阳《变更具体行政行为的性质》
页数 10 字数 9544
【摘要】抽象行政行为和具体行政行为作为一学术上的分类被行政诉讼法所采用，囿于学分类，抽象行政行为与具体行政行为不能在行政机关的全部行政行为中划出两者的明确界线，且在理论和实践中一直未能得到很好的解决。探讨两者的划分标准，不仅关系到法院对行政机关的监督范围和幅度，同时亦涉及到对行政相对人合法权益的保护力度。因此本文通过对两者定义的解释、理论界主要划分标准的评析、提出了对两者划分标准的建议几个方面来对两者的划分标准进行探讨。
【关键词】抽象行政行为,具体行政行为,划分标准
【abstract】As a academic classification, abstract administrative behavior and concrete administrative behavior are introduced into administrative proceeding. Limited by academic classification, abstract administrative behavior and concrete administrative behavior can not have a clear confines in all the administrative organ’s adiminstrative behavior, and further more it has not been well resolve yet. It is obvious that discuss their compartmentalize criterion, not only relate to the court’s supervision extension, but also relate to the protective degree to the civilian‘s rights and interets. So the article explains the two definition, comments the compartmentalize criterion, and aslo puts forward some suggestions about the criterion of the two definition’s compartmentalization. Finally the article even discusses the criterion of the two definition’s compartmentalization.
【Key word】abstract administrative behavior concrete administrative behavior
compartmentalize criterion
【参考资料】
【文献】1、罗豪才主编 《行政法学》 北京大学出版社
2、刘莘、马怀德、杨惠基主编《中国行政法学新理念》 中国方正出版社
3、张文显主编 《法理学》 法律出版社
【论文】1、刘莘 《谈抽象行政行为的特征》
2、李向阳《变更具体行政行为的性质》
