新西兰奥特来罗瓦的公正和法律----外文资料翻译.doc
约12页DOC格式手机打开展开
新西兰奥特来罗瓦的公正和法律----外文资料翻译,摘要：本文通过对两个案例的学习，分析在新西兰奥特来罗瓦法律的实践和这个殖民大陆上“非法”、“不文明”以及“混乱”的关系。由于在奥特来罗瓦，法律和殖民利益的直接挂钩，我认为，无论在哈克党案还是迈尔五世万佳市议会案，关于辩护的法令都着重于法律的权威性和对差异性的排挤之间的关系。据两案的法官说，毛利法律的规定和文化与“法律和...
内容介绍
此文档由会员 wanli1988go 发布
ÕªÒª£º±¾ÎÄͨ¹ý¶ÔÁ½¸ö°¸ÀýµÄѧϰ£¬·ÖÎöÔÚÐÂÎ÷À¼°ÂÌØÀ´ÂÞÍß·¨ÂɵÄʵ¼ùºÍÕâ¸öÖ³Ãñ´ó½ÉÏ¡°·Ç·¨¡±¡¢¡°²»ÎÄÃ÷¡±ÒÔ¼°¡°»ìÂÒ¡±µÄ¹Øϵ¡£ÓÉÓÚÔÚ°ÂÌØÀ´ÂÞÍߣ¬·¨ÂɺÍÖ³ÃñÀûÒæµÄÖ±½Ó¹Ò¹³£¬ÎÒÈÏΪ£¬ÎÞÂÛÔÚ¹þ¿Ëµ³°¸»¹ÊÇÂõ¶ûÎåÊÀÍò¼ÑÊÐÒé»á°¸£¬¹ØÓڱ绤µÄ·¨Á×ÅÖØÓÚ·¨ÂɵÄȨÍþÐԺͶԲîÒìÐÔµÄÅż·Ö®¼äµÄ¹Øϵ¡£¾ÝÁ½°¸µÄ·¨¹Ù˵£¬Ã«Àû·¨ÂɵĹ涨ºÍÎÄ»¯Óë¡°·¨ÂɺÍÖÈÐò¡±ÕâÒ»ÔÔòÏë³åÍ»¡£¸ù¾ÝÖ³ÃñÁªÏµ£¬Ã«Àû·¨ÂɺÍÎÄ»¯ÓëÎÄÃ÷µÄÍþв֮¼äËù±íÏÖ³öÀ´µÄ¹Øϵ£¬·¨ÂɺÍÖÈÐòÕ¹ÏÖÁË·¨ÂɶÔÓÚÒ»ÖÖÓÐÎÄ»¯Æ«²îµÄÏ°¹ßµÄ²Ù¿Ø£¬²¢ÇÒ·´Ó³ÁËÅÁ¿Ë¹þ£¨Å·ÖÞÐÂÎ÷À¼µÄÊ¿×壩µÄÀûÒæ¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÌôÕ½ÄǸ¡³öË®ÃæµÄÍþвÒÑʹ·¨ÂÉÔÚÈκΰ¸×ÓÀﶼչÏÖ³öÆäÔÓеÄÍþв£¬±©Â¶ÄÇÔ±¾¾Í¿ØÖÆ×ÅËüµÄ±©Á¦£¬Ò²Òò´ËΪ¹«ÖÚ´ò¿ªÁËÅúÆÀµÄ´óÃÅ¡£Ò²Ðí±ÈʵÖÊÉ϶ÔÌåϵµÄ¹¥»÷¸üÀ÷º¦µÄÊÇ£¬ÕâЩ·¨Á¶ÁË·¨ÂɶԹ«ÕýÐÔµÄÌôÕ½£¬²»½öʹ·¨ÂÉÓпÉÄ@@ÉΪһÖÖÌض¨ÎÄ»¯½×²ãÀûÒæµÄ·´Ó³£¬¶øÇÒÒò´ËÄܱ»¸Ä±äµÃ¿ÉÒÔΪ¹«Õý·þÎñ¡£
ABSTRACT. Through two case studies, this essay examines the relationship between the operation and practice of law in Aotearoa New Zealand and the naming of the ¡®unlawful¡¯, ¡®uncivil¡¯ or ¡®disorderly¡¯ within a colonial context. Against the background of the apparent complicity between law and colonial interest and desire in Aotearoa, I argue that, in both the ¡®Haka Party¡¯ case (1979) and Mair v Wanganui City Council (1996), the acts of the defendants draw attention to the relationship between the authority of the law and the repression or exclusion of difference. According to the judges in both cases, the dictates of Maori law and custom were in conflict with the principles of ¡®law and order¡¯. Read in terms of colonial relations, the perceived relationship between Maori law and custom and the threat to ¡®civilisation¡¯, law and order reveals the way in which ¡®the law¡¯ has operated in a culturally biased manner and has reflected the interests of Pakeha (New Zealanders of European descent). Thus, the perceived threat of the challenge made to the law in either case
ABSTRACT. Through two case studies, this essay examines the relationship between the operation and practice of law in Aotearoa New Zealand and the naming of the ¡®unlawful¡¯, ¡®uncivil¡¯ or ¡®disorderly¡¯ within a colonial context. Against the background of the apparent complicity between law and colonial interest and desire in Aotearoa, I argue that, in both the ¡®Haka Party¡¯ case (1979) and Mair v Wanganui City Council (1996), the acts of the defendants draw attention to the relationship between the authority of the law and the repression or exclusion of difference. According to the judges in both cases, the dictates of Maori law and custom were in conflict with the principles of ¡®law and order¡¯. Read in terms of colonial relations, the perceived relationship between Maori law and custom and the threat to ¡®civilisation¡¯, law and order reveals the way in which ¡®the law¡¯ has operated in a culturally biased manner and has reflected the interests of Pakeha (New Zealanders of European descent). Thus, the perceived threat of the challenge made to the law in either case
