基于plc的自动化系统的远程诊断的设计_外文翻译.doc
约22页DOC格式手机打开展开
基于plc的自动化系统的远程诊断的设计_外文翻译,全文为word排版，包含英文原文及中文翻译。内容完整，质量精良，建议下载参考！！！摘要在故障诊断中的性能故障排除任务通常是在不同工业领域的应用研究。在以前进行了几个实验的研究中了解过程接口的能力，以协助当地的故障诊断和疑难排解，同时考虑到接口影响，故障性质和专业知识的疑难解答。虽然有几个远程诊断架构已经提出和已经制定标...
内容介绍
此文档由会员 莎士比亚 发布
全文为word排版，包含英文原文及中文翻译。内容完整，质量精良，建议下载参考！！！
摘要
在故障诊断中的性能故障排除任务通常是在不同工业领域的应用研究。在以前进行了几个实验的研究中了解过程接口的能力，以协助当地的故障诊断和疑难排解，同时考虑到接口影响，故障性质和专业知识的疑难解答。虽然有几个远程诊断架构已经提出和已经制定标准远程诊断的水平，在何种程度上的远程诊断体系结构的设计，可以帮助在诊断和远程故障诊断的影响因素性能没有被频繁的问题的疑难解答。“本文的目的是了解影响远程故障诊断的性能的因素，包括远程诊断架构，故障类型，层次的专业知识，远程疑难解答，当地运营商和技术水平。实验是在其中进行故障排除，使用三个层次的远程诊断体系结构诊断不同类型的故障，在可编程逻辑控制器根据离散自动化装配系统，同时加入当地工程师和新手驾驶员。结果表明，故障是因为测量或监测相关的诊断远程专家故障排除工具的问题，远程系统变量故障排除性能的提升能增加远程诊断体系结构的水平。与此相反，新手疑难排解，与这些故障的诊断有显著差异，在远程故障诊断性能方面观察三者之间的架构，对新手疑难排解遇到的一些问题与管理提供更多的信息。专家们展现出更好的信息收集能力，他们花了更多的时间在每个信息源，完成来自较少的转换之间的信息故障诊断。监控系统参数无关故障导致显著减少了远程故障诊断性能，与所有三个架构比较，相关的监控系统参数故障为专家和新手排解疑难问题。工程师和新手之间的性能故障排除的远程整体差异运营商并没有明显发现。
关键词：远程诊断 控制架构 远程维护 故障排除 可编程逻辑控制器 第二阶段图
Abstract
Troubleshooting performance in fault diagnosis tasks is commonly studied in various industrial applications. Several experiments were performed in previous studies to understand the ability of process interfaces to assist troubleshooters in local fault diagnosis while considering the effect of interface, nature of the failure, and the expertise of the troubleshooter. Although several remote diagnosis architectures have been proposed and standards have been developed for levels of remote diagnosis, the extent to which the design of a remote diagnosis architecture can assist a troubleshooter in diagnosis and the factors affecting remote troubleshooting performance have not been frequently addressed. The objective of this paper is to understand the factors that impact remote troubleshooting performance, including remote diagnosis architecture, type of failure, level of expertise of the remote troubleshooter, and skill level of the local operator. Experiments were performed in which troubleshooters used three levels of remote diagnosis architectures to diagnose different types of failures in a programmable logic controller based discrete automated assembly system while working with local engineer and novice operators. The results suggest that for diagnosis of failures related to measured or monitored system variables by remote expert troubleshooters, remote troubleshooting performance improved with the increase in the levels of the remote diagnosis architectures. In contrast, in diagnosis of these failures by novice troubleshooters, no significant difference was observed between the three architectures in terms of remote troubleshooting performance, and the novice troubleshooters experienced problems with managing the increased information available. The experts exhibited better information gathering capabilities in that they spent more time per information source and made fewer transitions between information sources while diagnosing failures. Failures unrelated to monitored system parameters resulted in significantly reduced remote troubleshooting performance with all three architectures in comparison to the failures related to monitored system parameters for both expert and novice troubleshooters. The difference in terms of overall remote troubleshooting performance between engineer and novice operators was not found to be significant.
Keywords：Remote diagnosis; Control architecture; Tele-maintenance; Troubleshooting; Programmable Logic Controller; Stage diagram
摘要
在故障诊断中的性能故障排除任务通常是在不同工业领域的应用研究。在以前进行了几个实验的研究中了解过程接口的能力，以协助当地的故障诊断和疑难排解，同时考虑到接口影响，故障性质和专业知识的疑难解答。虽然有几个远程诊断架构已经提出和已经制定标准远程诊断的水平，在何种程度上的远程诊断体系结构的设计，可以帮助在诊断和远程故障诊断的影响因素性能没有被频繁的问题的疑难解答。“本文的目的是了解影响远程故障诊断的性能的因素，包括远程诊断架构，故障类型，层次的专业知识，远程疑难解答，当地运营商和技术水平。实验是在其中进行故障排除，使用三个层次的远程诊断体系结构诊断不同类型的故障，在可编程逻辑控制器根据离散自动化装配系统，同时加入当地工程师和新手驾驶员。结果表明，故障是因为测量或监测相关的诊断远程专家故障排除工具的问题，远程系统变量故障排除性能的提升能增加远程诊断体系结构的水平。与此相反，新手疑难排解，与这些故障的诊断有显著差异，在远程故障诊断性能方面观察三者之间的架构，对新手疑难排解遇到的一些问题与管理提供更多的信息。专家们展现出更好的信息收集能力，他们花了更多的时间在每个信息源，完成来自较少的转换之间的信息故障诊断。监控系统参数无关故障导致显著减少了远程故障诊断性能，与所有三个架构比较，相关的监控系统参数故障为专家和新手排解疑难问题。工程师和新手之间的性能故障排除的远程整体差异运营商并没有明显发现。
关键词：远程诊断 控制架构 远程维护 故障排除 可编程逻辑控制器 第二阶段图
Abstract
Troubleshooting performance in fault diagnosis tasks is commonly studied in various industrial applications. Several experiments were performed in previous studies to understand the ability of process interfaces to assist troubleshooters in local fault diagnosis while considering the effect of interface, nature of the failure, and the expertise of the troubleshooter. Although several remote diagnosis architectures have been proposed and standards have been developed for levels of remote diagnosis, the extent to which the design of a remote diagnosis architecture can assist a troubleshooter in diagnosis and the factors affecting remote troubleshooting performance have not been frequently addressed. The objective of this paper is to understand the factors that impact remote troubleshooting performance, including remote diagnosis architecture, type of failure, level of expertise of the remote troubleshooter, and skill level of the local operator. Experiments were performed in which troubleshooters used three levels of remote diagnosis architectures to diagnose different types of failures in a programmable logic controller based discrete automated assembly system while working with local engineer and novice operators. The results suggest that for diagnosis of failures related to measured or monitored system variables by remote expert troubleshooters, remote troubleshooting performance improved with the increase in the levels of the remote diagnosis architectures. In contrast, in diagnosis of these failures by novice troubleshooters, no significant difference was observed between the three architectures in terms of remote troubleshooting performance, and the novice troubleshooters experienced problems with managing the increased information available. The experts exhibited better information gathering capabilities in that they spent more time per information source and made fewer transitions between information sources while diagnosing failures. Failures unrelated to monitored system parameters resulted in significantly reduced remote troubleshooting performance with all three architectures in comparison to the failures related to monitored system parameters for both expert and novice troubleshooters. The difference in terms of overall remote troubleshooting performance between engineer and novice operators was not found to be significant.
Keywords：Remote diagnosis; Control architecture; Tele-maintenance; Troubleshooting; Programmable Logic Controller; Stage diagram
