c#的优点[外文及翻译].rar
c#的优点[外文及翻译],c#的优点[外文及翻译]包含中文翻译和英文原文，内容详细完整，建议下载参考！中文： 1500字英文： 5370字符c#在某种程度上可以看作是.net面向windows环境的一种编程语言。在过去的十几年里，microsoft给windows和 windows api添加了许多功能，vb和c++也经历了许多变化。虽然vb和...
该文档为压缩文件,包含的文件列表如下:
内容介绍
原文档由会员 xiaowei 发布
C#的优点[外文及翻译]
包含中文翻译和英文原文，内容详细完整，建议下载参考！
中文： 1500字
英文： 5370字符
C#在某种程度上可以看作是.NET面向Windows环境的一种编程语言。在过去的十几年里，Microsoft给Windows和 Windows API添加了许多功能，VB和C++也经历了许多变化。虽然VB和C++最终已成为非常强大的语言，但这两种语言也存在问题，因为它们保留了原来的一些内容。
对于Visual Basic来说，它的主要优点是很容易理解，许多编程工作都很容易完成，基本上隐藏了Windows API和COM组件结构的内涵。其缺点是Visual Basic从来没有实现真正意义上的面向对象，所以大型应用程序很难分解和维护。另外，因为VB的语法继承于BASIC的早期版本(BASIC主要是为了让初学者更容易理解，而不是为了编写大型商业应用程序)，所以不能真正成为结构化或面向对象的编程语言。
另一方面，C++在ANSI C++语言定义中有其自己的根。它与ANSI不完全兼容，因为Microsoft是在ANSI定义标准化之前编写C++编译器的，但已经相当接近了。遗憾的是，这导致了两个问题。其一，ANSI C++是在十几年前的技术条件下开发的，因此不支持现在的概念(例如Unicode字符串和生成XML文档)，某些古老的语法结构是为以前的编译器设计的(例如成员函数的声明和定义是分开的)。其二，Microsoft同时还试图把C++演变为一种用于在Windows上执行高性能任务的语言—— 在语言中避免添加大量Microsoft专用的关键字和各种库。其结果是在Windows中，该语言成为了一种非常杂乱的语言 ......
Where C# Fits In
In one sense, C# can be seen as being the same thing to programming languages as .NET is to the Windows environment. Just as Microsoft has been adding more and more features to Windows and the Windows API over the past decade, Visual Basic and C++ have undergone expansion. Although Visual Basic and C++ have ended up as hugely powerful languages as a result of this, both languages also suffer from problems due to the legacies of how they have evolved.
In the case of Visual Basic 6 and earlier, the main strength of the language was the fact that it was simple to understand and didn’t make many programming tasks easy, largely hiding the details of the Windows API and the COM component infrastructure from the developer. The downside to this was that Visual Basic was never truly object-oriented, so that large applications quickly become disorganized and hard to maintain. As well as this, because Visual Basic’s syntax was inherited from early versions of BASIC (which, in turn, was designed to be intuitively simple for beginning programmers to understand, rather than to write large commercial applications), it didn’t really lend itself to well-structured or object-oriented programs.
C++, on the other hand, has its roots in the ANSI C++ language definition. It isn’t completely ANSIcompliant for the simple reason that Microsoft first wrote its C++ compiler before the ANSI definition had become official, but it comes close ......
包含中文翻译和英文原文，内容详细完整，建议下载参考！
中文： 1500字
英文： 5370字符
C#在某种程度上可以看作是.NET面向Windows环境的一种编程语言。在过去的十几年里，Microsoft给Windows和 Windows API添加了许多功能，VB和C++也经历了许多变化。虽然VB和C++最终已成为非常强大的语言，但这两种语言也存在问题，因为它们保留了原来的一些内容。
对于Visual Basic来说，它的主要优点是很容易理解，许多编程工作都很容易完成，基本上隐藏了Windows API和COM组件结构的内涵。其缺点是Visual Basic从来没有实现真正意义上的面向对象，所以大型应用程序很难分解和维护。另外，因为VB的语法继承于BASIC的早期版本(BASIC主要是为了让初学者更容易理解，而不是为了编写大型商业应用程序)，所以不能真正成为结构化或面向对象的编程语言。
另一方面，C++在ANSI C++语言定义中有其自己的根。它与ANSI不完全兼容，因为Microsoft是在ANSI定义标准化之前编写C++编译器的，但已经相当接近了。遗憾的是，这导致了两个问题。其一，ANSI C++是在十几年前的技术条件下开发的，因此不支持现在的概念(例如Unicode字符串和生成XML文档)，某些古老的语法结构是为以前的编译器设计的(例如成员函数的声明和定义是分开的)。其二，Microsoft同时还试图把C++演变为一种用于在Windows上执行高性能任务的语言—— 在语言中避免添加大量Microsoft专用的关键字和各种库。其结果是在Windows中，该语言成为了一种非常杂乱的语言 ......
Where C# Fits In
In one sense, C# can be seen as being the same thing to programming languages as .NET is to the Windows environment. Just as Microsoft has been adding more and more features to Windows and the Windows API over the past decade, Visual Basic and C++ have undergone expansion. Although Visual Basic and C++ have ended up as hugely powerful languages as a result of this, both languages also suffer from problems due to the legacies of how they have evolved.
In the case of Visual Basic 6 and earlier, the main strength of the language was the fact that it was simple to understand and didn’t make many programming tasks easy, largely hiding the details of the Windows API and the COM component infrastructure from the developer. The downside to this was that Visual Basic was never truly object-oriented, so that large applications quickly become disorganized and hard to maintain. As well as this, because Visual Basic’s syntax was inherited from early versions of BASIC (which, in turn, was designed to be intuitively simple for beginning programmers to understand, rather than to write large commercial applications), it didn’t really lend itself to well-structured or object-oriented programs.
C++, on the other hand, has its roots in the ANSI C++ language definition. It isn’t completely ANSIcompliant for the simple reason that Microsoft first wrote its C++ compiler before the ANSI definition had become official, but it comes close ......
