论我国取保候审制度的完善.rar
论我国取保候审制度的完善,1.69万字26页包括开题报告，任务书，封面，完整论文，文献综述等整套完整毕业资料!摘要针对我国取保候审制度存在的诸多不足之处，我们有必要引进英国的保释制度。英国的保释制度作为一项刑事诉讼制度，在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身自由权利，保证诉讼程序的正常进行等方面发挥着重要作用。本文拟就保释制度与...
该文档为压缩文件,包含的文件列表如下:
内容介绍
原文档由会员 lyy1314 发布
论我国取保候审制度的完善
1.69万字 26页
包括开题报告，任务书，封面，完整论文，文献综述等整套完整毕业资料!
摘要
针对我国取保候审制度存在的诸多不足之处，我们有必要引进英国的保释制度。英国的保释制度作为一项刑事诉讼制度，在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身自由权利，保证诉讼程序的正常进行等方面发挥着重要作用。本文拟就保释制度与我国的取保候审制度进行比较研究，以便能完善我国的取保候审制度，权当抛砖引玉。
本文正文分四个部分。第一部分论述取保候审在我国的现状。包括取保候审在我国的发展现状和取保候审存在的问题。第二部分对英国保释制度进行考察。考察内容包括英国保释制度的历史演进、英国保释制度的基本内容及英国保释制度的理念基础。第三部分将我国的取保候审与英国的保释制度进行比较。为借鉴英国保释制度完善我国取保候审作铺垫。第四部分笔者就如何借鉴英国保释制度，完善我国取保候审制度进行论述。笔者先对我国取保候审改革进行宏观的思考，在转变诉讼观念的前提下将取保候审的性质从强制措施的权力性质转变为保障人权的权利性质；然后笔者对我国取保候审改革进行了微观的思考，具体从五方面来借鉴英国的保释制度，完善我国的取保候审制度，使之与我国建设现代法治国家的目标相适应。
关键词：取保候审，保释，完善
On the Improvement of the System of Posting a Bail and Awaiting Trial with Restricted Liberty of Moving in China
Abstract
As the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving has something inadequate, it is necessary for us to recommend bail system used in England. The bail system in England, as a system of administrative lawsuit, plays an indispensable role in guaranteeing suspect, defendant’s personal freedom rights, and guaranteeing the normal process of judicial proceeding, etc. This paper focuses on the comparison between the bail system and the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China. In such a way, the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving will be more perfect. It is just like a volunteer to give an opinion so that others may follow suit.
There are four parts in body of the paper. In the first part, the author introduces the present situation on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, including its development and problem at present. In the second part, the author makes an investigation of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in England, including the development of its history, the basic content of it, and the idea basis of it. In the third part, a comparison on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving is made between China and England, which makes a preparation to the next part. In the fourth part, the author discusses the way how to improve the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China by drawing on the experience of bail system in England. It will be discussed from two aspects in the following: On the one hand, the author thinks deeply on the improvement of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a macroscopic perspective. In the basis of transforming lawsuit concept, the author aims to transform the nature of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from mandatory measures to the guarantee of human rights. On the other hand, the author thinks deeply on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a microcosmic perspective. The improvement on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, which benefits by England’s experience, is revealed in five aspects in detail, so that the system will be adaptable to the goal of China’s establishment of a modern country with perfect law.
Keywords：Bail system，Bail out，Perfect
目 录
目 录 I
摘 要 Ⅲ
Abstract Ⅳ
前 言 1
一、取保候审在我国的现状 2
（一）取保候审在我国的发展 2
（二）取保候审存在的问题 2
二、英国保释制度的考察 6
（一）英国保释制度的历史演进 6
（二）英国保释制度的基本内容 8
1.保释的适用范围 8
2.保释的保证形式 8
3.保释的决定主体 9
4.违反保释规定的法律责任 9
5.保释的救济程序 10
（三）英国保释制度的理论基础 10
1.自由理念 10
2.无罪推定 11
三、取保候审与保释制度的比较 12
（一）取保候审与保释制度的相似之处 12
（二）取保候审与保释制度的不同之处 12
四、借鉴保释制度，完善取保候审 15
（一）取保候审改革的宏观思考 15
（二）取保候审改革的微观思考 16
1.适用范围方面 16
2.保证形式方面 16
3.决定权方面 17
4.制裁举措方面 17
5.救济程序方面 18
结 论 19
参考文献 20
致 谢 21
参考文献
[1]徐静村.刑事诉讼法学（第三版）（上）[M].北京：法律出版社，2008.
[2]林兆波，王砚图.取保候审制度存在的缺陷和出路[A].见陈卫东.保释制度与取保[M].北京:中国检察出版社，2009.
[3]林苗.权力腐败与权力制约[M].北京：法律出版社，1998.
[4]邱小梅.有关保释制度的一点思考[D].载于陈卫东.保释制度与取保候审.北京：中国检察出版社，2003.
[5]任寰.关于在我国刑事诉讼中建立司法审查制度的构想[J].法学，2003(5).
[6]李佑安,安永勇.取保候审与保释制度比较研究[J].载于陈卫东.保释制度与取保候审.北京：中国检察出版社，2003.
[7]栗克元.刑事诉讼法学[M].河南：郑州大学出版社，2004.
[8]陈卫东.保释制度与取保候审[M].北京：中国检察出版社，2003.
[9]张建良.刑事强制措施要论[M].北京：中国人民公安大学，2005.
[10]陈光中.外国刑事诉讼程序比较研究[M].北京：法律出版社，1988.
[11][英]L•B•科尔森.朗文法律词典[M].（英文版）.北京：法律出版社，2003.
[12][英]P•H•科林.英汉双解法律词典[M].（英文版）.世界图书出版公司，1998.
[13]周振想.论金钱保释制度[J].中外法学，1994(3).
[14]徐静村,潘金贵.论英国保释制度及其借鉴意义[J].政治与法律，2004(1).
[15]房国宾,邱俊芳,齐玥.两大法系保释制度比较研究及我国保释制度的立法和构建[J].法学研究(甘肃社会科学)，2005(4).
1.69万字 26页
包括开题报告，任务书，封面，完整论文，文献综述等整套完整毕业资料!
摘要
针对我国取保候审制度存在的诸多不足之处，我们有必要引进英国的保释制度。英国的保释制度作为一项刑事诉讼制度，在保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身自由权利，保证诉讼程序的正常进行等方面发挥着重要作用。本文拟就保释制度与我国的取保候审制度进行比较研究，以便能完善我国的取保候审制度，权当抛砖引玉。
本文正文分四个部分。第一部分论述取保候审在我国的现状。包括取保候审在我国的发展现状和取保候审存在的问题。第二部分对英国保释制度进行考察。考察内容包括英国保释制度的历史演进、英国保释制度的基本内容及英国保释制度的理念基础。第三部分将我国的取保候审与英国的保释制度进行比较。为借鉴英国保释制度完善我国取保候审作铺垫。第四部分笔者就如何借鉴英国保释制度，完善我国取保候审制度进行论述。笔者先对我国取保候审改革进行宏观的思考，在转变诉讼观念的前提下将取保候审的性质从强制措施的权力性质转变为保障人权的权利性质；然后笔者对我国取保候审改革进行了微观的思考，具体从五方面来借鉴英国的保释制度，完善我国的取保候审制度，使之与我国建设现代法治国家的目标相适应。
关键词：取保候审，保释，完善
On the Improvement of the System of Posting a Bail and Awaiting Trial with Restricted Liberty of Moving in China
Abstract
As the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving has something inadequate, it is necessary for us to recommend bail system used in England. The bail system in England, as a system of administrative lawsuit, plays an indispensable role in guaranteeing suspect, defendant’s personal freedom rights, and guaranteeing the normal process of judicial proceeding, etc. This paper focuses on the comparison between the bail system and the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China. In such a way, the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving will be more perfect. It is just like a volunteer to give an opinion so that others may follow suit.
There are four parts in body of the paper. In the first part, the author introduces the present situation on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, including its development and problem at present. In the second part, the author makes an investigation of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in England, including the development of its history, the basic content of it, and the idea basis of it. In the third part, a comparison on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving is made between China and England, which makes a preparation to the next part. In the fourth part, the author discusses the way how to improve the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China by drawing on the experience of bail system in England. It will be discussed from two aspects in the following: On the one hand, the author thinks deeply on the improvement of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a macroscopic perspective. In the basis of transforming lawsuit concept, the author aims to transform the nature of the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from mandatory measures to the guarantee of human rights. On the other hand, the author thinks deeply on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving from a microcosmic perspective. The improvement on the system of posting a bail and awaiting trial with restricted liberty of moving in China, which benefits by England’s experience, is revealed in five aspects in detail, so that the system will be adaptable to the goal of China’s establishment of a modern country with perfect law.
Keywords：Bail system，Bail out，Perfect
目 录
目 录 I
摘 要 Ⅲ
Abstract Ⅳ
前 言 1
一、取保候审在我国的现状 2
（一）取保候审在我国的发展 2
（二）取保候审存在的问题 2
二、英国保释制度的考察 6
（一）英国保释制度的历史演进 6
（二）英国保释制度的基本内容 8
1.保释的适用范围 8
2.保释的保证形式 8
3.保释的决定主体 9
4.违反保释规定的法律责任 9
5.保释的救济程序 10
（三）英国保释制度的理论基础 10
1.自由理念 10
2.无罪推定 11
三、取保候审与保释制度的比较 12
（一）取保候审与保释制度的相似之处 12
（二）取保候审与保释制度的不同之处 12
四、借鉴保释制度，完善取保候审 15
（一）取保候审改革的宏观思考 15
（二）取保候审改革的微观思考 16
1.适用范围方面 16
2.保证形式方面 16
3.决定权方面 17
4.制裁举措方面 17
5.救济程序方面 18
结 论 19
参考文献 20
致 谢 21
参考文献
[1]徐静村.刑事诉讼法学（第三版）（上）[M].北京：法律出版社，2008.
[2]林兆波，王砚图.取保候审制度存在的缺陷和出路[A].见陈卫东.保释制度与取保[M].北京:中国检察出版社，2009.
[3]林苗.权力腐败与权力制约[M].北京：法律出版社，1998.
[4]邱小梅.有关保释制度的一点思考[D].载于陈卫东.保释制度与取保候审.北京：中国检察出版社，2003.
[5]任寰.关于在我国刑事诉讼中建立司法审查制度的构想[J].法学，2003(5).
[6]李佑安,安永勇.取保候审与保释制度比较研究[J].载于陈卫东.保释制度与取保候审.北京：中国检察出版社，2003.
[7]栗克元.刑事诉讼法学[M].河南：郑州大学出版社，2004.
[8]陈卫东.保释制度与取保候审[M].北京：中国检察出版社，2003.
[9]张建良.刑事强制措施要论[M].北京：中国人民公安大学，2005.
[10]陈光中.外国刑事诉讼程序比较研究[M].北京：法律出版社，1988.
[11][英]L•B•科尔森.朗文法律词典[M].（英文版）.北京：法律出版社，2003.
[12][英]P•H•科林.英汉双解法律词典[M].（英文版）.世界图书出版公司，1998.
[13]周振想.论金钱保释制度[J].中外法学，1994(3).
[14]徐静村,潘金贵.论英国保释制度及其借鉴意义[J].政治与法律，2004(1).
[15]房国宾,邱俊芳,齐玥.两大法系保释制度比较研究及我国保释制度的立法和构建[J].法学研究(甘肃社会科学)，2005(4).
