论督促程序的完善.rar
论督促程序的完善,1万多字包括开题报告,任务书,封面,论文,文献综述,课题审核表,周进展记录表等完整资料!摘 要督促程序最先出现于罗马法中。我国于1991年在《民事诉讼法》中增设了督促程序,对于债权人请求债务人给付金钱、有价证券的案件,符合法定条件的,可以向有管辖权的基层人民法院申请支付令。这项制度曾被理论界和司法实务界...
该文档为压缩文件,包含的文件列表如下:
内容介绍
原文档由会员 lyy1314 发布
论督促程序的完善
1万多字
包括开题报告,任务书,封面,论文,文献综述,课题审核表,周进展记录表等完整资料!
摘 要
督促程序最先出现于罗马法中。我国于1991年在《民事诉讼法》中增设了督促程序,对于债权人请求债务人给付金钱、有价证券的案件,符合法定条件的,可以向有管辖权的基层人民法院申请支付令。这项制度曾被理论界和司法实务界寄予厚望。但是十几年下来,由于有关督促程序的相关规定过于简单、原则,不便操作,导致其实践效果与当初期望相去甚远。本文对我国督促程序的现状进行了分析,找出我国现行督促程序存在案件受理范围较为混乱、对异议权缺少相应的条件限制、关于督促程序费用负担的规定不利于保护债权人的合法权益、受理费用过低、督促程序的设置缺乏与诉讼程序的有机联系等不足,并提出了完善的建议,包括增设启动督促程序的新途径、明确督促程序的适用范围、合理确定支付令收费标准、健全支付令异议审查制度、缩短督促程序的办案周期等。
关键词:督促程序 支付令 现状 完善
Essay On The Improvement Of The Supervision Procedure In China
Abstract
The supervision procedure appears first in the Roman law. Our country additionally built the supervision procedure in 1991 in "Civil procedure law", regarding the creditor requested that the debtor pays the money, the negotiable securities case, meets the legal condition, may to have the jurisdiction basic-level people's court application payment command. This system once placed by the theorists and the judicial practical realm the great expectations. But several years get down, because the related supervision procedure's related stipulation is too simple, the principle, the inconvenient operation, caused its practice effect with initially to expect is very different. This article supervised the procedure to our country the present situation to carry on the analysis, discovers our country present supervision procedure existence case to accept the scope to be more chaotic, Lacks the corresponding condition limit to the objection power, Does not favor about the supervision procedure expense burden's stipulation protects creditor's legitimate rights and interests, Accepts the expense to be excessively low, The supervision procedure's establishment lacks with legal procedure insufficiencies and so on organic connections, And put forward the perfect proposal, Including addition start supervision procedure new way, Is clear about the applicable scope of the supervision procedure, The reasonable determination payment makes the charging criterion, perfect the investigation System of Payment command, the reduction supervision procedure handles a case the cycle and so on.
Keywords: Supervision procedures; Payment command; Present situation;Improvement
目 录
摘 要………………………………………………………………Ⅲ
Abstract…………………………………………………………………Ⅳ
前 言………………………………………………………………1
一、督促程序的含义及特点…………………………………………1
(一)督促程序的含义…………………………………………………1
(二)督促程序的特点…………………………………………………2
二、我国督促程序的现状及原因分析………………………………3
(一)督促程序的案件受理范围较为混乱……………………………3
(二)对异议权缺少相应的条件限制…………………………………4
(三)关于督促程序费用负担的规定不利于保护债权人的合法权益…………………………………………………………………………4
(四)案件受理费过低,一些法院受利益驱使,不愿或限制受理督促程序案件…………………………………………………………………4
(五)督促程序设置不合理,缺乏与诉讼程序的有机联系…………5
三、关于完善我国督促程序的几点建议……………………………6
(一)增设启动督促程序的新途径……………………………………6
(二) 明确督促程序的适用范围………………………………………6
(三) 合理确定支付令收费标准………………………………………7
(四)健全支付令异议审查制度………………………………………8
(五)缩短督促程序的办案周期………………………………………9
结 论………………………………………………………………9
参考文献…………………………………………………………11
致 谢………………………………………………………………12
参 考 文 献
[1]王启富,陶髦[M].长春:法律辞海:吉林人民出版社,1998.
[2]廖永安.民事诉讼理论探索与程序整合「M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
[3]何文燕.民事诉讼法学「M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,湖南大学出版社,2001.
[4]陈刚.比较民事诉讼法「M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[5]常怡.比较民事诉讼法「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[6]章武生.民事简易程序研究「M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[7]李勇.论督促程序「D].北京:中国政法大学,2003.
[8]陈荣宗,林庆苗.民事诉讼法「M].台湾:台湾三民书局,1996.
[9]阐红伟.我国督促程序的司法完善「J].天津市政法管理学院院报,2002, 2.
[10]焦宏昌.港澳台法制概论「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996.
[11]Rajeev Dhavan,"Whose Law?Whose Interest?",Public Interest Law,edited by Jeremy Cooper and Rajee Dhavan,Basil Blackwell Inc, New York,1986.
[12](日)谷口安平.王亚新译.程序的正义与诉讼「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[13]沈达明.比较民事诉讼法初论「M].北京:中信出版社,1991.
[14]张俊浩.民法学原理「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.
[15]马远超.普通程序兼并督促程序初探「J].政治与法律,2000, 4.
[16]蔡虹.非讼程序的理论思考与立法完善「J].华中科技大学学报,2004, 3.
1万多字
包括开题报告,任务书,封面,论文,文献综述,课题审核表,周进展记录表等完整资料!
摘 要
督促程序最先出现于罗马法中。我国于1991年在《民事诉讼法》中增设了督促程序,对于债权人请求债务人给付金钱、有价证券的案件,符合法定条件的,可以向有管辖权的基层人民法院申请支付令。这项制度曾被理论界和司法实务界寄予厚望。但是十几年下来,由于有关督促程序的相关规定过于简单、原则,不便操作,导致其实践效果与当初期望相去甚远。本文对我国督促程序的现状进行了分析,找出我国现行督促程序存在案件受理范围较为混乱、对异议权缺少相应的条件限制、关于督促程序费用负担的规定不利于保护债权人的合法权益、受理费用过低、督促程序的设置缺乏与诉讼程序的有机联系等不足,并提出了完善的建议,包括增设启动督促程序的新途径、明确督促程序的适用范围、合理确定支付令收费标准、健全支付令异议审查制度、缩短督促程序的办案周期等。
关键词:督促程序 支付令 现状 完善
Essay On The Improvement Of The Supervision Procedure In China
Abstract
The supervision procedure appears first in the Roman law. Our country additionally built the supervision procedure in 1991 in "Civil procedure law", regarding the creditor requested that the debtor pays the money, the negotiable securities case, meets the legal condition, may to have the jurisdiction basic-level people's court application payment command. This system once placed by the theorists and the judicial practical realm the great expectations. But several years get down, because the related supervision procedure's related stipulation is too simple, the principle, the inconvenient operation, caused its practice effect with initially to expect is very different. This article supervised the procedure to our country the present situation to carry on the analysis, discovers our country present supervision procedure existence case to accept the scope to be more chaotic, Lacks the corresponding condition limit to the objection power, Does not favor about the supervision procedure expense burden's stipulation protects creditor's legitimate rights and interests, Accepts the expense to be excessively low, The supervision procedure's establishment lacks with legal procedure insufficiencies and so on organic connections, And put forward the perfect proposal, Including addition start supervision procedure new way, Is clear about the applicable scope of the supervision procedure, The reasonable determination payment makes the charging criterion, perfect the investigation System of Payment command, the reduction supervision procedure handles a case the cycle and so on.
Keywords: Supervision procedures; Payment command; Present situation;Improvement
目 录
摘 要………………………………………………………………Ⅲ
Abstract…………………………………………………………………Ⅳ
前 言………………………………………………………………1
一、督促程序的含义及特点…………………………………………1
(一)督促程序的含义…………………………………………………1
(二)督促程序的特点…………………………………………………2
二、我国督促程序的现状及原因分析………………………………3
(一)督促程序的案件受理范围较为混乱……………………………3
(二)对异议权缺少相应的条件限制…………………………………4
(三)关于督促程序费用负担的规定不利于保护债权人的合法权益…………………………………………………………………………4
(四)案件受理费过低,一些法院受利益驱使,不愿或限制受理督促程序案件…………………………………………………………………4
(五)督促程序设置不合理,缺乏与诉讼程序的有机联系…………5
三、关于完善我国督促程序的几点建议……………………………6
(一)增设启动督促程序的新途径……………………………………6
(二) 明确督促程序的适用范围………………………………………6
(三) 合理确定支付令收费标准………………………………………7
(四)健全支付令异议审查制度………………………………………8
(五)缩短督促程序的办案周期………………………………………9
结 论………………………………………………………………9
参考文献…………………………………………………………11
致 谢………………………………………………………………12
参 考 文 献
[1]王启富,陶髦[M].长春:法律辞海:吉林人民出版社,1998.
[2]廖永安.民事诉讼理论探索与程序整合「M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.
[3]何文燕.民事诉讼法学「M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,湖南大学出版社,2001.
[4]陈刚.比较民事诉讼法「M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[5]常怡.比较民事诉讼法「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[6]章武生.民事简易程序研究「M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[7]李勇.论督促程序「D].北京:中国政法大学,2003.
[8]陈荣宗,林庆苗.民事诉讼法「M].台湾:台湾三民书局,1996.
[9]阐红伟.我国督促程序的司法完善「J].天津市政法管理学院院报,2002, 2.
[10]焦宏昌.港澳台法制概论「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996.
[11]Rajeev Dhavan,"Whose Law?Whose Interest?",Public Interest Law,edited by Jeremy Cooper and Rajee Dhavan,Basil Blackwell Inc, New York,1986.
[12](日)谷口安平.王亚新译.程序的正义与诉讼「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[13]沈达明.比较民事诉讼法初论「M].北京:中信出版社,1991.
[14]张俊浩.民法学原理「M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.
[15]马远超.普通程序兼并督促程序初探「J].政治与法律,2000, 4.
[16]蔡虹.非讼程序的理论思考与立法完善「J].华中科技大学学报,2004, 3.